Prime Minister fails to deny climate change targets make it unfeasible
Heathrow is the UK's largest source of CO2 emissions. Picture: Dunk
Campaigners against the expansion of Heathrow Airport are claiming that the government’s new, more ambitious climate change targets have effectively ruled out a third runway.
A commitment has been made to cut emissions by 78% by 2035, which given the amount aviation contributes to the UK’s total output of CO2, suggests an overall expansion of the industry during this period would not be possible.
At a Downing Street press conference on Tuesday (20 April) the Prime Minister was asked if the inclusion of aviation emissions in the target would mean that regional airports would have to carry fewer flights or close if Heathrow was to be expanded.
Boris Johnson responded, “Heathrow…that’s a matter for the company concerned, it is a private matter. They’ve got to get it through and fund it and finance it themselves and my own views about that particular matter are well known. But that doesn’t mean that I am opposed to aviation.”
Heathrow Airport has been the single biggest source of carbon emissions in the UK, emitting 20 megatons of CO2 per year which equates to around 60% of total UK aviation emissions. The Climate Change Committee (CCC) anticipates that the aviation sector will still be emitting 23MtCO2 in 2050, yet Heathrow expansion – in the form of a third runway would increase the airport’s emissions to 27MtCO2 per year.
Geraldine Nicholson from local campaign group Stop Heathrow Expansion, said, “This is bold step and is a good news day in our campaign to stop Heathrow’s third runway.
“Aviation emissions were not included in our national emissions targets for too long and now act as yet another death knell for Heathrow airport in their crestfallen quest for expansion.”
Paul McGuiness, chair of the No 3rd Runway Coalition, said, “Heathrow expansion is dead. It is simply not compatible with the UK Government’s commitment to do our part in protecting the climate.
“With aviation now having to live within carbon emissions limits, and the Government’s position being that there can be no net expansion of UK aviation, the expansion of activity at one airport will need to be offset by the restriction of activity at another.”
He added, “I don’t think it’s likely that anyone, other than Heathrow’s foreign based shareholders, will be foolish enough to advocate for a relegation of economic opportunity in the regions, and an abandonment of the government’s levelling-up agenda.”
The Prime Minister has previously said he would “lie down in front of bulldozers and stop construction” when he was Mayor of London but absented himself from the country when a key vote was taking place on the issue in the Commons.
The comments after the four leading candidates in London Mayoral elections voiced their opposition to Heathrow expansion.
Sadiq Khan said that a third runway would be “disastrous” for the environment, while Shaun Bailey, Sian Berry and Luisa Porritt all said they would oppose the project.
A Heathrow spokesperson said, "We agree with the Prime Minister that aviation growth and a green future are not mutually exclusive. Carbon is the enemy not flying and low carbon Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) will be key to decarbonisation – the Government must act now to introduce a mandate that requires a minimum of 10% SAF use by airlines by 2030, rising to at least 50% by 2050. Action in the UK alone however will not be enough and risks just offshoring emissions - climate change requires a global response and we will support the Government in its efforts to secure a global agreement for net zero aviation by the end of next year. The Government's Airports National Policy Statement is clear that Heathrow expansion will only be delivered in-line with strict environmental limits - that remains the case today which is why we welcome the Government’s plans to accelerate the decarbonisation of aviation.”
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact firstname.lastname@example.org and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
April 22, 2021